Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

Anatomy of a US Treasury Sell-Off

18 April 2025
4 min watch
AIP_Treasuries_SDiMaggio_Subtitled_FINAL
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      | Head—Fixed Income
      Transcript

      The bond market has been extremely volatile the past couple of weeks since the introduction of global tariffs by the US. Bond yields have sold off almost 50 basis points, and today we'd like to examine why did that occur, what's next, and how should investors think about duration in this environment?

      We think there are four key factors that have contributed to the US Treasury sell-off in April. The first reason is volatility in the equity markets. The volatility in the equity markets has led to deleveraging and has led to margin calls, which has caused forced sales of US Treasuries.

      These Treasuries wind up on dealer balance sheets. We see repo rates inch higher as a way to reflect that lack of buyers in the market. We do not think the unwind of the basis trade contributed to the sell-off, but it certainly was a factor once momentum had begun.

      Reason number two is tariffs. We don't know quite the magnitude or the extent of the tariffs, but we do know that tariffs will contribute to inflation in 2025. And this is making investors nervous. We also know the Federal Reserve has commented that they are worried about tariffs and the inflationary impact. And that they might be hesitant to reduce interest rates.

      Factor number three are the fiscal concerns. They're intensifying as the budget-reconciliation blueprint progresses through Congress. Rumored additional deficit worries are spooking the bond market and investors and are causing additional pressure on the term premium, especially out to 30 years.

      Factor four, foreign investor divestment. Secretary Bessent recently confirmed that there was no evidence of foreign selling of US Treasuries in April. We're going to put this more in the rumor right now more so than the fact category, but it is something to keep an eye on as we roll through this global tariff war.

      This is no time to panic on duration. We have low visibility into what tariff rates will be, what countries they will affect, and what industries will be impacted.

      What we do believe is that all of this uncertainty—and tariffs themselves—are going to cause a dramatic slowing in US economic growth. This dramatic slowdown will impact the jobs market, and eventually the Federal Reserve will be forced to cut interest rates, we think three to four times this year. This monetary easing should be supportive of the bond market, especially for bonds maturing in less than 10 years.

      It's imperative that we closely monitor the US fiscal situation. The reconciliation bill is making its way through Congress. We have insight that it should be completed by the beginning of June. We do expect the budget deficit to be around 6%, which we think is well in line with market expectations and should be supportive for the bond market.

      We expect the upcoming auction of Treasury bonds to be well received by both US and international investors. Clients should expect the Fed to support the bond market if there are signs of distress. So far, we have seen periods of some lower liquidity where bid-asks have widened, but overall, no systemic problems, no real stress in the Treasury market. We believe there is zero probability of a US Treasury default centered around the debt-ceiling debate.

      Given this outlook, we're focused on three ways to manage duration risk.

      Stay active. We strongly believe that Treasuries will exhibit negative correlations for when risk assets come under duress. Volatility remains high, which will create opportunities to both buy and sell. Currently, with yields around 4.5%, we think this is a good entry point for duration.

      We maintain our belief that the US economy will decelerate and that will cause the Federal Reserve to reduce interest rates. This tends to be a good environment for curve steepeners, and investors should consider adding positions at the front end of the curve.

      One silver lining is that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is keenly focused on funding costs and term premium in the bond market. While structural pressures are building, this level of attention by policymakers should act as a potential buffer and helps to anchor investor expectations around duration.

      The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams, and are subject to change over time.


      About the Authors

      Scott DiMaggio is a Senior Vice President, Head of Fixed Income and a member of the Operating Committee. As Head of Fixed Income, he is responsible for the management and strategic growth of AB’s fixed-income business and investment decisions across the department. DiMaggio has previously served as director of Global Fixed Income and continues to be a portfolio manager across numerous multi-sector and multi-currency strategies. Prior to joining AB’s Fixed Income portfolio-management team, he performed quantitative investment analysis, including asset-liability, asset-allocation, return attribution and risk analysis for the firm. Before joining the firm in 1999, DiMaggio was a risk management market analyst at Santander Investment Securities. He also held positions as a senior consultant at Ernst & Young and Andersen Consulting. DiMaggio holds a BS in business administration from the State University of New York, Albany, and an MS in finance from Baruch College. He is a member of the Global Association of Risk Professionals and a CFA charterholder. Location: New York