And, of course, market volatility is always top of mind. Nearly three-quarters of respondents view major market volatility as a threat to their retirement goals, while only about one-quarter believe their retirement savings strategy can weather turbulent markets.
We think these concerns create a great opportunity for DC plan sponsors to engage with employees by highlighting tools that can help steer employees in the right direction on their retirement savings journey. Few participants are financial experts, and many could use a helping hand. Plan design is critical, too—we believe that automatic enrollment is a great starting point, as it uses inertia to boost participation and retention rates.
Target-Date Funds: Widely Available, but Are They Used?
Our survey results point to a disconnect between the popularity of target-date funds, which adjust their investment mix as participants move toward and into retirement, and the extent of their actual usage.
The Investment Company Institute estimates that 90% of 401(k) plans offer target-date funds, so nine out of every 10 plans offer them as options. Yet, 60% of our survey respondents either don’t use target-date funds or aren’t sure whether they do. To us, this may indicate that some plans don’t designate target-date funds as the default option for people signing up. Or it may point to an adoption time lag. Longtime employees may have simply continued with whatever investments they started with one, two or even three decades ago.
There’s reason to believe that the latter reason might be the case, given the growing popularity of target-date funds with younger workers. Our survey finds that 45% of respondents under 35 years of age invest in target-date funds—well above the 33% of participants over 55 that do. This growing wave of target-date fans could lead to greater usage in the future. But that most likely would require the help of plan design elements that encourage adoption, such as making automatic enrollment into a target-date fund a plan’s default option.
Demand for Lifetime Income, but Hesitancy Regarding the Means
Across the board, participants also tell us they want guaranteed income in retirement. But there’s resistance to some of the traditional means of getting it. Nearly 40% of respondents cite the effects of inflation as a concern, which likely stems from worries about the declining purchasing power of fixed annuity payments. Participants also resist guaranteed-income products due to a perceived lack of control over assets (21%) and costs (16%).
We think one solution is to add target-date fund solutions with a guaranteed lifetime income component—one that pays heed to participants’ concerns. These funds may help continue the automatic “do it for me” of target-date funds, while still allowing participants control over their assets within an appropriate long-term investment strategy.
This combination appears to have broad support among our respondents who already invest in target-date funds. More than 90% of them find this somewhat appealing, appealing or extremely appealing. And more than two-thirds tell us they’d invest in such a solution if it were available in their plan. Here again, plan sponsors have an opportunity to guide participants and harness inertia: a mere 2% of respondents say they’d opt out if they were automatically enrolled in a lifetime-income target-date fund.
DC plan participants are showing resurgent confidence against an inflationary backdrop, but there are still challenges on the journey to retirement. Solutions will need to come from many different sources. Based on the results of our survey, DC plan providers could be among the most important.