Equities Blog

Can European Healthcare Stocks Surmount US Political Pressures?

06 June 2019

3 min read

Jane Bleeg| Portfolio Manager—Global Healthcare

Healthcare stocks have underperformed this year amid growing fears about pressure on US drug prices. But in pockets of the European healthcare industry where these fears are overdone, we think selective investors can find attractive opportunities.

Global healthcare stocks have risen by 5.8% this year through the end of April, trailing the broader market by a wide margin. While this is partly a result of investors’ recent preference for hot technology stocks and other high beta names, it also reflects recurrent fears about drug pricing pressure in the US stemming from government-mandated pricing reform.

Fears about drug pricing pressure in the US are well-founded. Most European healthcare companies are global, particularly the large-cap pharmaceutical companies that dominate the sector in European equity indices. European pharmaceutical companies typically make between 30% and 50% of their total pharma sales in the US. So major changes to the US healthcare system designed to reduce drug costs, a staple topic both for Democratic 2020 presidential campaigns and for Trump tweets, would have a significant impact on the fortunes of European Big Pharma.

Healthcare Stocks and US Elections

Historically, healthcare stocks have not performed well in the 18 months before US presidential elections. Why? The US still spends roughly twice as much as the rest of the developed world on healthcare as a proportion of per capita GDP (Display), so the uncertainty created during election campaigns tends to unsettle the sector.

US Healthcare Spending Is Much Higher than in Developed Europe

Total Healthcare Expenditure

Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
Through 31 December 2017
Source: Congressional Budget Office, OECD and AB Bernstein analysis

US healthcare costs continue to rise faster than GDP and are a growing burden on household spending as the proportion of drug costs that falls on patients rather than insurers continues to increase. While rising costs affect all parts of the system—hospital costs, drugs, physician visits and so on—drug costs are usually the most visible. So reducing the cost of medicines—including those made and marketed by European companies—will remain a major topic in US politics between now and the presidential election in November 2020. Rhetoric on the subject is likely to continue to weigh on healthcare companies’ stock prices.

But major regulatory reform, such as European-style universal state-funded medical coverage, is unlikely to pass into law, in our view. In the US, healthcare accounts for well over 10% of employment. No politician who wants to be elected will seek to wipe out millions of jobs, often high-paying ones. But pharmaceutical companies enjoy high margins in the US. Their drugs’ prices will remain a tempting political target. So some incremental reform is likely to pass.

Opportunities in European Healthcare

Given the US political risk, where are the return opportunities in European healthcare? One possible safe haven is medical technology and device-makers, whose products are a less visible and politically less sensitive component of healthcare costs. These companies are generally expensive. However, Getinge of Sweden has a well-diversified set of products and geographic exposure and has been doing a good job reducing operating costs, in our view.

Another potentially attractive area is companies that are developing and introducing significant improvements in the standard of care for serious diseases; these tend not to be subject to the same pricing pressures as more mature treatments. In fact, securing payment for meaningful but expensive innovative treatments is typically easier in the US than in much of Europe.

Switzerland’s Roche is a good example. Roche is currently launching Hemlibra, a significant advance in the standard of care for haemophilia. And its pipeline includes treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a devastating muscle wasting disease mostly present in children, and Huntington’s disease, which causes movement disorders and dementia, typically starting in middle age.

Yet Roche is currently trading at a discount to its European pharma peers due to concerns surrounding generic competition to three of its largest drugs. Our research suggests that many investors have accurately assessed the impact of generics but are not giving Roche sufficient credit for its industry-leading pipeline of novel drugs that will advance the standard of care in a wide range of indications. We think these products should help shelter Roche from pricing pressure in the U.S.

Investors need to proceed with caution in the healthcare sector as US political risks become more prominent. At the same time, we think select healthcare names can be a significant source of return in a high-conviction European equity portfolio.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams and are subject to revision over time. AllianceBernstein Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom.

About the Author

Jane Bleeg

Jane Bleeg is a Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager for the Global Healthcare team. Prior to this, she was a portfolio manager for European Value Equities—a role she assumed in 2022. Before that, Bleeg was a senior research analyst responsible for European healthcare and US large-cap pharmaceutical companies for the Value Equities Group. Before joining the firm in 2016, she was an engagement manager in the life sciences practice of L.E.K. Consulting, an analyst for Great Point Partners, a healthcare hedge fund, and an investment banking analyst in the healthcare investment banking group at Piper Jaffray & Co. Bleeg holds a BBA (magna cum laude) in finance from the University of Notre Dame and an MBA (with distinction) from Saïd Business School at the University of Oxford. Location: London

This is a marketing communication. This information is provided by AllianceBernstein (Luxembourg) S.à r.l. Société à responsabilité limitée, R.C.S. Luxembourg B 34 305, 2-4, rue Eugène Ruppert, L-2453 Luxembourg. Authorised in Luxembourg and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an invitation to purchase any security or other investment. The views and opinions expressed are based on our internal forecasts and should not be relied upon as an indication of future market performance. The value of investments in any of the Funds can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This information is directed at Professional Clients only and is not intended for public use.