The Ripple Effect: Tariffs and Their Implications

12 May 2025
5 min watch
The Ripple Effect: Tarrifs and Their Implications - Winograd-Rouma Subtitled
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 5:12
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 5:12
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Sandra Rhouma| European Economist—Fixed Income
    Eric Winograd| Director—Developed Market Economic Research and Chief US Economist
    Transcript

    ERIC WINOGRAD

    Tariffs are a tax, and they’re a tax paid by the domestic entity that imports goods from overseas. And like any tax, they have economic impacts. Tariffs push prices up, and they push growth down.

    Because it’s the United States that’s imposing most of the tariffs at this stage, we think the implications for the United States are going to be the most significant, certainly in the form of increased prices. Because it is domestic actors who pay this tariff at the border, it’s very likely that they will be passing some of that on to consumers. What we’re talking about is a scenario in which prices go up, and households thus have less money to spend, and so growth goes down..

    But that isn’t uniform. And in Europe, for example, it [00:05:00] isn’t clear that you’re going to get both higher prices and lower growth.

    SANDRA RHOUMA

    Exactly. In Europe, the impact is quite different from the US in that it’s not necessarily inflationary. Actually, it could be the opposite. It adds an additional disinflationary driver in a region where disinflation was already well underway. And the disinflationary driver comes not so much from the direct impact of tariffs from the US on Europe, but from the indirect impact of tariffs imposed from the US to China.

    You can think about, you know, Chinese exports to the US now essentially reduced to zero. And China will need to find other markets to export [to]. And it’s naturally going to export more to Europe, given the size of the market, right? To do that, they might decrease the price of [the] goods they’re going to sell to European markets and therefore export disinflation to Europe. While for growth, it’s clearly negative.

    ERIC WINOGRAD

    It’s negative in Europe from a growth perspective because Europe does export a lot to the United States, right?

    SANDRA RHOUMA

    Exactly. So again, you think of a country like Germany: it exports close to 4% of its GDP to the US. You have other countries that are more insulated, but overall for the region, the impact is clearly negative, and it’s recessionary for some countries.

    ERIC WINOGRAD

    Yeah. And it just points out that this is a more complicated issue than simply the US imposing tariffs on imported goods. It has global impacts, and it has indirect impacts too.

    But when we bring that back to the economy, the fact that we don’t know is itself a problem, right?

    SANDRA RHOUMA

    Exactly. The uncertainty is a hit to growth already.

    ERIC WINOGRAD

    I want to focus a little bit on that word “uncertainty,” because that really is, I think, the dominant paradigm, not just in financial markets but for central banks at this point as well. The ECB has already cut rates significantly this year; the Fed hasn’t. So for the Fed, it’s a matter of restarting something. For the ECB, it’s merely a matter of continuation.

    SANDRA RHOUMA

    Exactly. The ECB is much more focused on inflation than on growth. And if services inflation continues to ease, and eases faster than expected, then, you know, it’s a green light for them to continue.

    ERIC WINOGRAD

    We’re more confident that the ECB will cut, and cut aggressively, than we are that the Fed will. And so most of the time, we would say, “Okay, that’s a good reason to be long in the US dollar.” And yet the dollar has weakened over the course of the last couple of months. What does that mean for the euro area? What does it mean to have a stronger euro?

    SANDRA RHOUMA

    I think there is a willingness from policymakers at the ECB to strengthen the role of the euro, not necessarily the euro itself. And if the strong euro is now a structural [phenomenon], they will have to find kind of the sweet spot where the euro is more important in international transactions, without necessarily, you know, being a threat to their inflation target.

    ERIC WINOGRAD

    It’s a tough balance, right? Because the US also, you know, the US officially has a strong dollar policy. What we mean by the strong dollar policy is the idea that the US does play a predominant role in global trade and in settling global transactions. It isn’t meant as a specific reference to the exchange rate of the currency at this point, but it does have an implication for the exchange rate, which is that there’s always sort of this excess demand for dollars because of the role it plays in the global financial system.

    And that’s one of the things that the current administration seems to want to push back against. It would like to have a weaker dollar because that would further its goals of reducing the trade deficit. But how you hit, and I really like the way you said that, how you hit the sweet spot…

    SANDRA RHOUMA

    Yeah.

    ERIC WINOGRAD

    ... of being an important currency but one whose exchange rate still allows you to hit your economic goals, well, that’s a tough trick to pull, especially in what is the world’s largest market, and one that really is resistant to policymakers controlling exchange rates.

    The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams, and are subject to change over time.


    About the Authors

    Sandra Rhouma is a Vice President and European economist on the Fixed Income team. Previously, she was a global economist and strategist at Millennium Global Investments, a London-based currency investment manager. From 2019 to 2022, Rhouma worked for the European Central Bank as a banking supervision analyst before moving into a US economist position. She holds a PhD in economics from the University of Surrey and a master’s degree from Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Location: London

    Eric Winograd is a Senior Vice President and Director of Developed Market Economic Research. He joined the firm in 2017. From 2010 to 2016, Winograd was the senior economist at MKP Capital Management, a US-based diversified alternatives manager. From 2008 to 2010, he was the senior macro strategist at HSBC North America. Earlier in his career, Winograd worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the World Bank. He holds a BA (cum laude) in Asian studies from Dartmouth College and an MA in international studies from the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. Location: New York

    Please select your audience so that we can direct you to the most appropriate content.
    Terms and Conditions

    Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

    Terms Of Use

    This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

    Do you wish to continue?

    Cancel