High-Yield Bonds: Why Shorter May Be Smarter

22 May 2025
2 min read
Tugboat towing a large container ship
Will Smith, CFA| Director—US High Yield
AJ Rivers, CFA, FRM, CAIA| Head—US Retail Fixed Income Business Development

Looking to reduce volatility without sacrificing income potential? Consider short-maturity high yield.

Policy uncertainty and mixed economic signals continue to upend financial markets, generating heightened volatility. While the uptick in volatility may unsettle some high-yield bond investors, we believe the sector provides continued opportunity—and that by focusing on shorter-maturity debt, investors may be able to reduce portfolio volatility without sacrificing income potential.

Higher Yields with Less Volatility: A Potent Mix

Even in normal times, a shorter-term high-yield strategy can provide high levels of income, albeit with shorter bonds yielding less than longer-dated bonds. Today, however, flatter Treasury and spread curves mean short-maturity high-yield bonds yield more than intermediate- and long-term bonds (Display). That’s a marked departure from historical norms.

Today, Shorter High-Yield Bonds Yield More than Longer Bonds
Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index (Percent)
Bars showing high-yield bonds with maturities of 5 years and less yielding more than longer-dated high-yield bonds.

Current analysis does not guarantee future results.
As of April 30, 2025
Source: Bloomberg and AllianceBernstein (AB)

What’s more, yields are broadly elevated compared to historical levels of the last decade and a half. Today, yield to worst—a reliable predictor of five-year forward returns—exceeds many 10-year equity return projections. Higher yields provide a buffer against market volatility, as we saw in April, when high-yield spreads widened by roughly 60% owing to tariff concerns, but the sector nevertheless outperformed the equity market.

Short-maturity high-yield bonds also come with a more attractive risk profile than longer-term high-yield bonds, due to their lower sensitivity to changes in spread levels. Investors also have better visibility into near-term financial risks, allowing them to more easily avoid short-term bonds that might default. Typically, you’d expect to sacrifice yield in exchange for those advantages. But right now, investors in short high-yield bonds are being paid more to assume less risk.

Short Maturity Captures Less Downside

Short-maturity high-yield bonds can really show their mettle during periods of market volatility. During past equity market corrections, short-term high yield captured around three-fourths of traditional high yield’s drawdown, on average, and less than half the drawdown of equities (Display).

Shorter High Yield Has Captured Less Downside During Sell-Offs
Average Returns During Major Equity Sell-Offs, September 2000–April 2025 (Percent)
Bars showing short-maturity high yield losing less ground than traditional high yield and equities during market downturns.

Historical analysis does not guarantee future results.
Short-maturity high yield represented by Bloomberg US High Yield 1–5 Year Cash Pay 2% Index. High yield represented by Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index. Equities represented by S&P 500
Sell-off periods: dot-com bubble (September 1, 2000–October 9, 2002), global financial crisis (October 9, 2007–March 9, 2009), commodity crisis
(July 17, 2015–February 11, 2016), COVID-19 (February 19, 2020–March 20, 2020), 2022 hiking cycle (January 3, 2022–October 12, 2022) and tariff concerns (February 18, 2025–April 8, 2025)
As of April 30, 2025
Source: Bloomberg, S&P and AB

Our analysis also suggests that short-maturity high-yield bonds capture most of the broader high-yield market’s upside in risk-on environments, pointing to better potential risk-adjusted outcomes over full market cycles.

Credit Selection Matters

Of course, investors still need to be judicious about how they deploy capital, as heightened volatility can create dispersion among credit issuers. Tariffs may benefit some firms but handicap others, and slowing growth is particularly problematic for cyclicals and CCC-rated bonds—underscoring the importance of active management.

Currently, we see the best opportunities in non-cyclicals and high-yield credits rated B and above. In our view, these are better insulated from economic shocks than CCC-rated issues, which carry meaningfully higher default risk. In fact, historically, a portfolio of short-maturity BB and B-rated bonds has exhibited lower volatility than investment-grade BBB bonds.

For all these reasons, we believe that short-maturity high yield presents a timely opportunity for investors to stem volatility while capturing attractive income potential.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams, and are subject to change over time.


About the Authors

Will Smith is Director of US High Yield Credit. He is also a member of the High Income, Global High Yield, Limited Duration High Income, Short Duration High Yield and European High Yield portfolio-management teams. Smith designed and is one of the lead portfolio managers for AB’s Multi-Sector Credit Strategy, which invests across investment-grade and high-yield credit sectors globally.

A disciplined process that focuses on a variety of approaches—including quantitative, liquidity and macro models—to generate returns is key to Smith’s investment philosophy. This is an aggressive style within tight limits, one that emphasizes risk management and a longer investment horizon.

“Building better credit portfolios isn't just about humans doing deep research,” Smith says. “It’s focusing that research where and when other approaches won’t be as effective.”

AJ Rivers is a Senior Vice President and Head of US Retail Fixed Income Business Development. Prior to joining AB in 2022, he was the director of Product Strategy at Lord Abbett. Throughout his career, Rivers has been directly involved in the rates and credit markets, and has directed the product development and competitive positioning of investment strategies in traditional and alternative assets. He has held roles in trading, risk management, portfolio analytics and product strategy. Rivers attended the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University and graduated from the University at Buffalo for undergrad. He is a CFA charterholder, a Financial Risk Manager (FRM) and a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst (CAIA). Location: Nashville