Equity Outlook: Making Way for the Magnificent Others

02 July 2024
7 min read

Despite narrow market concentration, we see opportunities in high-quality stocks that haven’t yet been rewarded.

Global stocks posted healthy gains in the first half of 2024, although second-quarter performance moderated from the previous quarter’s breakneck pace. With inflation still sticky and equity returns concentrated, the time may be right for investors to broaden their horizons.

The MSCI ACWI advanced 11.3% during the half in US-dollar terms, with most of that coming in the first quarter (Display). Japanese equities—while continuing to perform strongly in local currency—came back to earth in the second quarter in US-dollar terms, as the yen continued to weaken. Emerging-market equities rose by 7.5% in the first half of the year but still lagged developed markets. US large-caps led global gains in the first half, even after losing momentum in the second quarter.

Global Equity Markets Advanced in First Half, Led by US Large-Cap Stocks
Line showing advance of MSCI ACWI in first half of 2024 and bars showing US large-caps leading first-half regional returns.

Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results.
*US large-caps represented by S&P 500, emerging markets by MSCI Emerging Markets, UK by MSCI UK, Japan by MSCI Japan, Europe ex UK by MSCI Europe ex UK, Australia by MSCI Australia, US small-caps by Russell 2000 and China by MSCI China A.
As of June 30, 2024
Source: FactSet, FTSE Russell, MSCI, S&P and AllianceBernstein (AB)

In a trend that has become familiar to equity investors, large-cap market breadth was again highly concentrated, with a good share of the S&P 500’s gains coming from a disproportionately small number of large technology companies. Technology and communication services set the pace, while healthcare stocks were aided by an uptake in GLP-1 drugs for weight loss. The real estate and materials sectors delivered the weakest performance (Display). Globally, growth stocks outpaced value stocks, which sputtered in the second quarter.

Technology and Growth Stocks Continued to Outperform
Bar charts showing technology outperforming other sectors and growth stocks outperforming value and min-vol stocks.

Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results.
As of June 30, 2024
Source: MSCI and AB

Inflation: Higher for Longer 

As the third quarter begins, inflation remains top of mind for global investors. In Europe, price increases moderated enough for the European Central Bank (ECB) to cut its primary interest rate from 4% to 3.75% in early June, but inflation is still hovering above the ECB’s long-range goal of 2%. The ECB joined Canada and the Swiss National Bank in easing monetary policy. To be sure, there are still some notable outliers in the struggle against inflation, such as China, where policymakers are more focused on kick-starting the struggling economy.

In the US, the Federal Reserve has stayed on the sidelines, largely because inflation has periodically surprised to the upside. Most recently, the Consumer Price Index cooled to 0.16% in May on a month-over-month basis—largely the result of falling energy prices and declines in transportation services. But with inflation still running above the Fed’s target, investors have done an about-face on expectations for multiple rate cuts in 2024. AB’s economists anticipate a soft landing for the global economy this year, with the Fed likely to hold off on monetary easing until the fourth quarter, barring a meaningful deterioration in the labor market.

With inflation elevated in the US and Europe, we believe equities deserve a prominent place in investors’ portfolios—particularly since pre-pandemic inflation rates may be a thing of the past. Historically, stocks have been an effective hedge against price increases, and they’ve consistently outpaced inflation over the past 100 years. In fact, when inflation has run between 2% and 4%—the current scenario in much of the developed world—equities have averaged annualized real returns of more than 8% on a rolling five-year basis (Display).

Equities Have Consistently Outpaced Inflation over 100 Years
Table showing real returns of equities outpacing those of Treasuries in different inflationary climates over 100 years.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Equity real returns are the average annualized five-year total returns of the S&P 500 adjusted for the change in the US consumer price index (CPI). Treasury bonds real returns are the average annualized five-year total returns of US 10-year Treasury bonds (constant duration) less the realized change in CPI data through January 31, 2024.
As of January 31, 2024
Source: Robert Shiller's database and AB

Geopolitical tensions and supply shocks could muddy the inflationary outlook. Still, in a higher-for-longer environment that has the world’s central banks wary of easing monetary policy too quickly, we believe equities are an integral component of long-term investment allocations.

Signs of a Broadening Market?

While equities may be well-positioned, gains have so far been inequitable. Just how concentrated has the market been? The top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 now comprise more than 35% of the index by market capitalization. That means that just 2% of companies in the S&P 500 are driving broader market performance.

Some of the world’s largest technology firms have been the primary beneficiaries of ballooning market capitalizations. Colloquially known as the Magnificent Seven—Alphabet (Google), Amazon.com, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Tesla—most of these companies have been riding the wave of a generative artificial intelligence (AI) revolution.

But change may be afoot. Some of the Magnificent Seven have faltered of late after earnings struggled to meet expectations. And within the group, the dispersion of returns between the best performers such as NVIDIA and Meta Platforms and the weaker names such as Tesla has continued to widen. There are also signs that market breadth is poised to widen. This is evidenced by a very low pairwise correlation of stocks, which indicates that individual names are trading more independently; our research suggests that this is a strong indicator of opportunity for active managers. In addition, earnings expectations for the broader global market are expected to converge toward the Magnificent Seven in the second half of 2024 and early 2025 (Display).

Earnings Growth Is Poised to Converge
Bars showing expected earnings of Magnificent 7 and non-Magnificent 7 firms converging in second half and beyond.

Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results.
For the first half of 2025, earnings estimates cover about 100% of S&P 500 companies and about 67% of MSCI World companies.
As of May 31, 2024
Source: FactSet, MSCI, S&P and AB

What About the “Magnificent Others”?

As market breadth widens, we see opportunities in what we call the “Magnificent Others.” These are firms that have sound balance sheets, consistent earnings streams and significant growth potential, but have not yet been rewarded by investors. Companies like these can be found across sectors and industries, including value segments and emerging markets, where many businesses aren’t tethered to local macroeconomic trends.

For example, in Europe, industrials make up nearly one-quarter of the MSCI Europe Growth Index—four times their weight in the comparable Russell 1000 Growth Index. Consensus earnings estimates for industrials in the MSCI Europe Growth Index are expected to increase to 15.9% by 2025—in line with estimates for the US technology sector. Many business models in the European industrials sector offer surprising sources of consistent growth, including companies that enable AI. While they may not make the GPU chips that power machine learning, some of these firms have earnings potential consistent with growth stocks.

The healthcare sector is also discovering how to use AI to unlock efficiencies and harness AI algorithms to create more effective drug candidates. Healthcare makes up 10% of global GDP—a structural tailwind that should gain momentum as developed-market populations age. These trends should help support solid long-term earnings growth among select companies with quality business models.

Punishing Misses, Yawning at Beats

Yet it’s clear that some high-quality companies aren’t getting the attention they deserve. Over the past decade, investors have shown a tendency to punish earnings misses, while brushing off companies that beat earnings forecasts.

This can be seen in the relative price responses following earnings releases. Our research shows that from a historical perspective, earnings beats are currently running higher than average, and yet high-performing firms haven’t been rewarded recently with subsequent price increases—in part due to the market dominance of a small number of mega-caps. By contrast, firms that have missed consensus earnings estimates have suffered blowback in the form of disproportionately large share-price hits (Display).

Companies Beating Earnings Expectations Have Not Been Rewarded
Bar chart showing that earnings misses have been penalized more than earnings beats have been rewarded.

Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results.
Earnings-per-share (EPS) estimates and report figures are sourced from Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. Quarter refers to the quarter in which the report was released. Reports in which the actual EPS value is within $0.005 of the average EPS estimate are classified as “meets”. “Beats” and “misses” are defined as reports in which the difference between actual EPS value and the estimate is greater than $0.005 or less than –$0.005, respectively. Returns are sourced from IDC. Total price response is the cumulative USD return of the stock from five weekdays before the report to five weekdays after the report, minus the cumulative benchmark return for the same period.
As of June 20, 2024
Source: IDC, MSCI, S&P, Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S and AB

These asymmetric reactions could be one sign of an expensive market with little room for error.  But they also underscore the case for active management, in our view. Given the high stakes of disappointing earnings growth—or, in some cases, downward revisions in earnings guidance—fundamental research can help separate successful firms from those at higher risk of earnings misses. At the same time, we believe it’s only a matter of time before companies with resilient business models and consistent earnings growth will be rewarded.

Investing Through a Period of Heightened Political Risk

As the third quarter progresses, we believe conditions are favorable for equities, but investors face uncertainty beyond just inflation and narrow market concentration—including changing political landscapes.

Wars in the Middle East and Ukraine continue to cast a shadow around the world, while US-China trade tensions simmer. After a big shift to the right in June’s European parliamentary elections, change could be coming to France and the UK, where elections will be decided in July. In emerging markets, recent elections in India, South Africa, Mexico and Argentina could lead to policy changes. And, of course, the world is anxiously awaiting the US elections in November.

But trying to make binary investment decisions based on political outcomes isn’t a prudent strategy for equity investors, in our view. History has shown that it’s notoriously difficult to forecast political results—often, the ultimate effect on economies, markets and companies is quite different than anticipated. It’s up to active managers to identify political risks and avoid companies exposed to acute risks that could overwhelm controllable financial results. The best antidote is to stay focused on business fundamentals and to identify companies that can overcome potential stresses from policy-driven decisions, such as tariffs.

If anything, we think heightened political and monetary policy risk reinforces the importance of active equities. Investors should seek to identify select companies that can consistently generate earnings above their cost of capital, which we view as a potent fundamental recipe for generating long-term returns. If investors can do this, they’ll be better able to assemble high-conviction portfolios that can withstand a range of exogenous challenges.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

References to specific securities discussed are not to be considered recommendations by AllianceBernstein L.P.

MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations, and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein.
The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI.

About the Authors