AI-Driven Spending Boom Is No Dot-Com Bust for Investors

16 April 2024

3 min read

Lei Qiu| Chief Investment Officer —Thematic Innovation Equities

Wentai Xiao| Senior Research Analyst—Thematic Innovation Equities

Today’s technology boom is being driven by real efficiency gains, which is why we think comparisons with the dot-com bubble are misguided.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is creating lots of buzz, and for good reason. New forms of machine learning have the potential to ramp up productivity, and the many potential applications of AI are just now being discovered. But has market enthusiasm for the technology gone too far?

Massive spending on supercharged computing is raising concerns about a return to the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and early 2000s, when inflated technology share prices eventually imploded. While we understand the comparisons, we believe they’re largely unfounded.

To understand why, we need to travel back in time and understand what drove the dot-com bubble.

The Dot-Com Bubble: A Lesson in Unsustainable Business Models

At the dawn of the internet era, telecom and cable providers poured billions of dollars into web infrastructure, while easy financing and investor exuberance drove tech-stock prices to new heights. But the business models needed to leverage this infrastructure weren’t fully developed, and tech-stock valuations got ahead of company fundamentals. Eventually, a long line of start-ups became overvalued, capital dried up and the bubble burst.

Some might argue that today’s build-out of AI servers harkens back to the dot-com heyday, which didn’t end well for investors. After all, by the end of 2024, more than $100 billion will have been invested in AI infrastructure by enterprises, cloud companies and governments.

But that’s where the similarities end.

AI Infrastructure Is Being Financed by Revenues—Not Speculation

Unlike many companies in the dot-com era, the mega-caps behind the current build-out of cloud infrastructure are already profitable. Substantial revenues are being generated on cloud infrastructure, from cloud application and infrastructure software to social media advertising. This is reflected in cloud capital intensity (capital expenditures as a percentage of total revenues), which has held steady because the infrastructure being built is already supported by demand (Display).

Revenues Support Cloud Infrastructure Build-Out

Bars showing relatively stable capital intensity levels since 2019

Current analysis and forecasts do not guarantee future results.
Capital intensity represents combined capital expenditures of Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Google, Oracle and Amazon Web Services divided by AB estimates of enterprise cloud revenues generated from data centers.
As of January 31, 2024
Source: Alphabet Inc., Amazon Web Services, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Oracle and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Rather than anticipating the next big product—a failed tactic of the dot-com boom—today’s profitable AI stalwarts are spending on cloud infrastructure primarily to improve efficiency. In fact, that’s perhaps the best way to view artificial intelligence—as an efficiency driver.

AI Spending Has More Room to Run

The current spending boom is centered on building the next layer of digital infrastructure—known as “accelerated compute”—where generative AI is just one among many applications. Accelerated compute is a more efficient form of computing infrastructure that supports both AI and non-AI workloads—everything from social media–content recommendations to probabilistic targeting to drug-discovery simulations. Much of this infrastructure is cloud based. The cloud can be thought of as a utility grid for advanced computing functions—akin to the electricity grid that powers the physical world. The resulting efficiency gains—and returns on investment—are driving faster AI adoption rates than many expected.

Accelerated compute represents a new paradigm for making feasible workloads that were previously impractical. ChatGPT estimates that it would have taken more than five years to train a 175-billion-parameter large-language model on general-purpose computing using high- end server CPUs. By contrast, using high-end server GPUs on accelerated compute, it would have taken two to four months. Simulation company ANSYS estimates that running a high-end aerodynamics simulation on accelerated compute could speed up simulation time by as much as 33 times.

And there’s still plenty of room to run. Currently, between 10 to 15 million CPUs are being shipped annually, compared with fewer than one million accelerated servers. We estimate that less than 25% of global installed computing-power capacity is accelerated (Display), up from close to zero just two years ago.

AI’s Share of Total Computing Capacity on the Rise

Accelerated Compute (Estimated Percentage of Global Installed Base)

Current analysis and forecasts do not guarantee future results.
Based on AB estimates of installed base of accelerated compute (GPU) and general purpose (CPU) servers and the assumption that one accelerated compute server represents the computing power of 30 general purpose servers.
As of March 31, 2024
Source: Advanced Micro Devices, Intel, NVIDIA and AB

Are Tech Stocks Overvalued?

The promise of a quantum leap in productivity is real, in our view. Yet, the adoption and application of the technology will play out over years, and it will take time for investors to identify the long-term business beneficiaries of this dramatic technology paradigm shift.

We’ve arrived at an inflection point that began in the early 1990s—a journey that has taken us from narrowband to broadband to mobile and now generative AI. Instead of comparing this stage of the technology evolution to the dot-com bubble, we believe it’s more useful to view it as an extension of Web 3.0—a vastly more efficient, decentralized internet connected by peer-to-peer networks and powered by machine learning.

In that context, we believe a good degree of market excess was already wrung out in 2022, when technology stocks fell sharply in a down market. While tech stocks have partially recovered from that shock, we don’t believe they’re as overvalued as some investors believe—and they’re certainly not at the levels seen during the dot-com era (Display).

Today’s Valuations Well Below Dot-Com-Era Levels

Nasdaq-100 Index

Lines showing that Nasdaq-100 valuations were much higher during dot-com bubble than today.

Current analysis and forecasts do not guarantee future results.
As of April 9, 2024
Source: Bloomberg and AB

Seismic technology cycles have inevitable ups and downs. But regardless of market conditions, equity investors can benefit from the return opportunities afforded by innovative disrupters. In the past, successful enablers of transformational innovation have enjoyed surprisingly large and lasting growth trajectories. So, we think companies that build differentiated competitive moats driven by AI have the potential to deliver long-term earnings growth for investors.

Today, we’re in the very early stage of a transformational digital infrastructure upgrade and product cycle. Industry trends suggest that this is not another technology bubble. With a patient and disciplined approach, we believe equity investors can identify companies with sustainable AI business models built on real profits, rather than false promise.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

About the Authors

Lei Qiu

Lei Qiu is the Chief Investment Officer for Thematic Innovation Equities and is responsible for the AB Global Disruptors and International Technology Portfolios. She has been a portfolio manager at AB since 2016 and was previously a senior research analyst, focusing on the technology, media and telecom sectors. Prior to joining the firm in 2012, Qiu was the founder and the managing partner for three years of Phidias Capital Management, a technology-focused asset-management company. From 2003 to 2009, she was a general partner and senior research analyst at Andor Capital Management, and from 2000 to 2002, she was a research analyst at Chilton Investment Company. From 1995 to 1997, Qiu worked as an investment banking analyst at Goldman Sachs & Co. She holds a BA in economics (magna cum laude) from Smith College and an MA in business economics from Harvard University. Location: New York

Wentai Xiao

Wentai Xiao is a Vice President and a Senior Research Analyst for Thematic Innovation Equities. She first joined AB in 2015 through the Equities Rotational Associate program, upon the completion of which she became a research analyst on the US Growth platform, where she was responsible for the coverage of semiconductors and software from 2017 to 2021. In 2023, Xiao rejoined AB after spending two years as an executive director and investment analyst at Tybourne Capital Management, where she also covered semiconductors and software. She holds a BA in economics from the University of Chicago. Location: London

This information is for exclusive use of the wholesale person to whom it is provided and is not to be relied upon by any other person. It is not intended for retail or public use and may not be further distributed without prior written consent of ABAL.
This webpage has been prepared by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (“ABAL”)—ABN 53 095 022 718, AFSL 230 698. Information in this webpage is only intended for persons that qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Corporations Act 2001, and is not to be construed as advice. This webpage is provided solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities. The information, forecasts and opinions set forth in this webpage have not been prepared for any recipient’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Neither this webpage nor the information contained in it are intended to take the place of professional advice.
You should not take action on specific issues based on the information contained in this webpage without first obtaining professional advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Projections, although based on current information, may not be realized. Information, forecasts and opinions can change without notice and ABAL does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time. Although care has been exercised in compiling the information contained in this webpage, ABAL does not warrant that this webpage is free from errors, inaccuracies or omissions. ABAL disclaims any liability for damage or loss arising from reliance upon any matter contained in this webpage except for statutory liability which cannot be excluded.
No reproduction of the materials on this webpage may be made without the express written permission of ABAL. This information is provided for persons in Australia only and is not being provided for the use of any person who is in any other country.

AI-Driven Spending Boom Is No Dot-Com Bust for Investors

The Dot-Com Bubble: A Lesson in Unsustainable Business Models

AI Infrastructure Is Being Financed by Revenues—Not Speculation

AI Spending Has More Room to Run

Are Tech Stocks Overvalued?

More For You